Retrospective Evaluation of Cases with Cow’s Milk Allergy
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Original Article
P: 379-386
December 2021

Retrospective Evaluation of Cases with Cow’s Milk Allergy

J Curr Pediatr 2021;19(3):379-386
1. Bursa Uludağ University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatric Allergy, Bursa, Turkey
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 14.07.2021
Accepted Date: 10.11.2021
Publish Date: 24.12.2021
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

ABSTRACT

Introduction:

Cow’s milk allergy (CMA) is described as immunological reaction against to one or more milk proteins. It is known that CMA which affects about 1-3% of the general population is the most commonly seen food allergy in infants and children. It is well known that a tolerance develops and prognosis is better during the first three years of the life. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the natural course of cases diagnosed with CMA and to determine the factors which have impact on the tolerance development.

Materials and Methods:

Medical records of cases who have been followed for CMA were retrospectively reviewed. Gender, age at first symptom, breastfeeding duration, family atopy history, multiple food allergies, concomitant allergic diseases, inhalant allergy sensitivity and clinical manifestation of cases were assessed. Also, prick test results, milk-specific IgE, casein-specific IgE and the reactions that developed during food challenge test were evaluated.

Results:

The age at first symptom was mean 4±2,3 months. Twenty-two percent of patients had a positive family history of atopy and 30% had multiple food allergies. There were concomitant allergic disorders in 58% of patients. Skin (93.8%), gastrointestinal system (GIS) (24.7%) and respiratory system (18.5%) symptoms were most commonly seen. The percentage of tolerance development by the years was determined as 41% for the first year, 64% for the second year and 75% for the third year. Milk-specific IgE level at the time of diagnosis (p=0.010) and asthma presence (p=0.010) were found significant risk factors for persistent CMA.

Conclusion:

Clinical parameters and allergy tests may help to predict the prognosis of CMA. Milk-specific IgE level at the time of diagnosis is the risk factor for persistent CMA.

Introduction

Cow’s milk allergy (CMA) is described as an immunological reaction against one or more milk proteins (1). Cow’s milk is the first outsider protein involved in the diet of newborns. It is known that CMA which affects about 1-3% of the general population is the most commonly seen food allergy in infants and children (1-3).

In patients with CMA, manifestations vary based on the immunological mechanism (4). Based on the underlying immunopathology, reactions are classified as follows; 1- IgE-mediated, 2- mixed IgE and non-IgE-mediated and 3- non-IgE-mediated (5).

In general, allergic diseases emerge during a chronological course which also described as an allergic march (6). Cow’s milk allergy is the first seen clinical form of atopy. Children with CMA have a risk for the development of atopic dermatitis in the early period and asthma, allergic rhinitis and inhalant allergen sensitivity in the forthcoming years. It is known that most patients acquire tolerance up to 3 years, and the prognosis is better (2,7). In the previous studies, the natural course of CMA and factors which have an effect on the prognosis were investigated, but variable results have been reported.

In the present study, demographics, clinical manifestations, skin prick test results, food-specific IgE levels of cases diagnosed with CMA were retrospectively analyzed. This study aimed to investigate the natural course of the disease and to determine the factors which affect the tolerance development.

Materials and Methos

This study was performed reviewing the medical records of patients diagnosed with CMA between August 2011 and August 2014. Ethics committee approval was obtained from Bursa Uludag University Local Ethics Committee.

Study Sample: CMA was diagnosed based on clinic history, allergy tests, elimination of cow’s milk from diet and oral food challenge test. Non-IgE-mediated CMA was diagnosed if symptoms disappear following the elimination of cow’s milk from diet and reappear the following feeding by cow’s milk as well as related clinic symptom presence. Data including gender, age at first symptom, breastfeeding duration, the age of the starting of complementary foods, family history of atopy, multiple food allergies, concomitant disease presence, inhalant allergen sensitivity, clinical manifestations, type of the milk protein intake were evaluated by medical chart review. Additionally, the results of the prick test and the levels of total IgE, milk- and casein-specific IgE were assessed. Tolerance was defined by a negative open CM challenge followed by regular consumption of an age-appropriate quantity of CM at home, without any symptoms.

Laboratory Methods

Skin Prick Testing (SPT): Sensitivity against to inhalant allergens (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus and fariena, Alternaria, pollen mixture), to foods (milk, egg, peanut) and to latex were evaluated by prick testing method. The reaction was considered positive when the mean induration diameter was at least 3 mm greater than that of the negative control. Diagnostic reliability of prick test for cow’s milk was ≥8 mm for children under the age of 2 and of ≥6 mm for children above the age of 2.

Total IgE Measurement: Total IgE level was measured by a chemiluminescent method using Immulite 2000 (Siemens) equipment and results were presented as kU/L. Results above the age-specific normal range were established to be high (8).

Food-Specific IgE Measurement: Cow’s milk and casein-specific IgE levels were measured from serum samples by FEIA method using ImmunoCAP (Pharmacia) device and the level of ≥0.35 kUA/L was accepted as positive. Milk-specific IgE levels of >15 kUA/l in children under 2 years old and >5 kUA/l in children above 2 years old were considered to be high (9).

Oral food challenge test: As a routine practice, test procedure and risks were initially explained to the families then informed consent was obtained from all patients’ parents. All patients were examined in Pediatric Allergy Policlinic before starting the test. Necessary preparations were made for possible emergency situations which may develop during the test. In healthy cases who had normal physical examination finding, cow’s milk was administered in increasing amounts over 20 minutes intervals. The test was terminated when the objective symptoms had developed. If no reaction was seen during the test, parents were informed about late reactions such as GIS manifestations and eczema. Then, patients were discharged after 4-hour monitoring. Parents were asked to report any delayed reactions which may occur into 72 hours after the test.

Statistical Analysis

Results were assessed using SPSS for Windows 13.0 Statistics software. Categorical data were given as number and percentage; numerical data were expressed as mean ±standard deviation (SD). Chi-square test was carried out to compare the categorical measurements. In independent samples, numerical data were compared using Student T-test when providing the assumptions or Mann-Whitney U test when not providing the assumptions. Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare two independent groups, and Pearson chi-square test or Fisher’s chi-square test was used to compare the categorical variables. Multivariate Logistic Regression analysis was used to determine which measurements can be used to ascertain the risk factor. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Totally, 81 patients with CMA were included. Characteristics of patients are shown in Table 1. Fifty-three (65%) of patients were male. For the whole study group, the mean follow-up duration was 19±10,8 months, age at first symptom was 4±2,3 months, breastfeeding duration was 15±7,8 months, and age of the starting complementary foods was 5,4 ±0,8 months. Family history was positive for atopy in 18 patients (22%). 24 patients (30%) had multiple food allergies; egg was the most commonly observed food allergy which was seen in 23 (28%) patients, hazelnut and fish allergies was determined in 3 (3.7%) and 1 (1.2%) patients, respectively. 47 of patients (58%) had concomitant allergic disease including asthma in 8 patients (10%), rhinitis in 11 patients (14%) and atopic dermatitis in 31 patients (38%). İn 5 patients, inhalant allergen sensitivity was observed (6.2%), in which all were mite allergy.

Table 1

Most frequently seen clinical manifestations were in skin, which was seen in 76 patients (94%), 20 patients (25%) had GIS symptoms and 15 (18.5%) had respiratory symptoms. Anaphylaxis development following cow’s milk protein intake was noted in 16 patients (20%).

Complimentary food which caused the first allergic reaction was formula feed in 32 patients (39.5%), yogurt in 25 (31%) patients and milk pudding in 6 (7.4%) patients. The allergic reaction was reported in 18 of patients (22%) while breastfeeding.

Evaluation of Tolerance Development: Of 81 patients included the study, 53 (65%) completed the 3-year follow-up period; cow’s milk tolerance developed in 40 patients (75%) but sensitivity was ongoing in 13 patients (25%) at the end of the 3-year follow-up period. When we analyzed improvement rates by years, it was 41% (n=22) within one year, 64% (n=34) within two years and 75% (n=40) within three years.

Comparison of characteristics between the patients acquired tolerance at the end of the 3-year follow-up and patients with persistent CMA is shown in Table 2. Asthma was not seen in patients acquired tolerance, and it was seen in 5 patients (38.5%) with persistent CMA (p<0.001). Inhalant allergen sensitivity was seen in one patient (2.5%) acquired tolerance and in 3 patients (23%) with persistent CMA. Inhalant allergen sensitivity was found to be statistically significant in patients with persistent CMA (p=0.042). In patients with persistent CMA, there was urticaria/angioedema in 84.6%, respiratory system symptoms in 61.5% and anaphylaxis in 77% of cases which were significantly higher compared to those in patients acquired tolerance (p<0.001).

Table 2

Comparison of Laboratory Findings of Patients Becoming Tolerant: Table 3 shows a comparison of laboratory findings of patients at the time of diagnosis.At the diagnosis time, induration diameter during the skin prick test with cow’s milk was above the predictive value in 3 patients (8.6%) acquired tolerance and 11 patients (92%) with persistent CMA (p<0.001). Total IgE level was found higher than normal range by age in 23 patients (59%) acquired tolerance and in 10 patients (77%) with persistent CMA (p=0.328). Milk-specific IgE level was 3,5±9 kUA/L in patients acquired tolerance and 51±37 kUA/L in patients with persistent CMA (p<0.001). Also, casein-specific IgE level was 1,8±7,5 kU/L in patients acquired tolerance and 28±27 kU/L in persistent CMA; it was significantly higher in patients with persistent CMA compared to the others (p<0.001).

Table 3

Multivariate Logistic Regression analysis was performed to determine the factors which affect the tolerance development to cow’s milk (Table 4). It was found that higher milk-specific IgE level at the time of diagnosis is a risk factor for persistent CMA. It was determined that higher milk-specific IgE level increased 1.10-fold (95% CI: 1,03-1,17; p=0.004) the persistent CMA risk as shown in Table 4.

Table 4

Discussion

In the present study, 65% of patients were male. It has been reported that male gender is a risk factor for CMA during childhood and CMA is seen more commonly in males (2, 10-12). In accordance with the literature, a number of male cases were found higher in our study.

Positive family history of atopy is a known risk factor for the development of atopic diseases in children. In a study by Santos et al. (11) who assessed 139 patients with CMA, positive family history of atopy has been reported at the rate of 35%. Dias et al. (13) have reported that 53% of patients >2 years old with CMA have a positive family history of atopy. The family history of atopy was positive in 22% of our patients.

Multiple food allergies were determined in 24 patients (30%) with CMA in our study. Food allergy incidence may vary by age and geographic area. Skripak et al. (10) have reported that 91% of their cases were allergic to multiple foods coexisting egg (79%), peanut (73%), tree nut (51%), soya (41%) and wheat (36%). In accordance with the literature, the most frequently coexisting second allergen was egg (28%) which was seen in 23 patients in our study. The others were hazelnut in 3 patients (3.7%) and fish in 1 patient (1.2%).

Allergic diseases emerge within a chronological course which is also described as an allergic march. It has been reported that children with CMA have a risk for the development of atopic dermatitis during the early period of disease and asthma, allergic rhinitis and inhalant allergen sensitivity occurrence for forthcoming years (10,11,14). In our study, the concomitant allergic disease was found in 47 patients (58%). Of them, 8 (10%) had asthma, 11 (14%) had rhinitis and 31 had (38%) atopic dermatitis. There was an inhalant allergen sensitivity in 5 patients (6%). Saarinen et al. (14) prospectively followed 118 children with the diagnosis of CMA until they were 8.6-years-old. The authors have reported asthma in 25.8%, rhinoconjunctivitis in 52.6%, atopic dermatitis in 76.7% and inhalant allergen sensitivity in 59.5% of cases. Our results confirmed that most frequent coexisting disease is atopic dermatitis in the early period. In our study, asthma, allergic rhinitis, and inhalant allergen sensitivity rates were found lower than those in literature. It was thought that this inconsistency may be due to our relatively shorter follow-up period (1-43 months).

In our study, most commonly seen clinical manifestations were skin (urticaria, angioedema, atopic dermatitis) in 76 patients (94%), GIS (vomiting, diarrhoea, bloody stool) in 20 patients (24.7%) and respiratory system symptoms (wheezing, dyspnea, rhinitis) in 15 patients (18.5%). Although CMA causes various clinical evidence, skin manifestations were most frequently reported in the literature (11,13). Anaphylaxis was determined in 16 cases (20%) in our study which were higher compared to those in the literature (11,13). Because our institute is a tertiary hospital, patients with more severe clinical manifestations may be referred to us. Hence, the discrepancy may be a result of this situation.

Foods caused first allergic reaction were formula feed in 32 patients (39.5%), yogurt in 25 cases (31%) and milk pudding in 6 patients (7.4%). First allergic reaction occurred in 18 of cases (22%) during breastfeeding. In a previous study, triggering factors were formula feed, breast milk, yogurt, partially hydrolyzed feed and deeply hydrolized feed or cow’s milk in 81%, 3.8%, 1.5%, 5.3% 0.8% of CMA cases, respectively (12). In accordance with the literature, formula feed was found to be the most common cause of first allergic reaction in our study.

In our study, tolerance developed in 40 of 53 patients (75%) during the 3-year follow-up period. Improvement rates by years were 41% for the first year, 64% for the second year and 75% for the third year. It is known that most patients acquire tolerance to cow’s milk until they are 3-year-old, and the prognosis is better (12,15,16). In a previous cohort study, a total of 1749 neonatal were followed during 15 years and tolerance development has been reported in 56% of infants diagnosed with CMA within 1 year of appearance. The rate was 77% for the second year and 87% for the third year (7). In another study, tolerance rate was reported 19.8% for the fourth year, 42% for the eighth year (10). Also, Bishop et al. (17) reported the tolerance rates as 28% for the second year and 56% for the fourth year.

In our study, we aimed to compare the characteristics of cases acquired or not acquired tolerance. Seventy percent of patients acquired tolerance and 69% of patients with persistent CMA were male. No sex difference was found for tolerance development in other studies (11,18). Similarly, in accordance with the literature, we did not find any effect of gender distribution on tolerance development.

It has been reported that age at first symptom is not associated with persistent CMA (11,19). We also found that age at first symptom did not differ between patients acquired tolerance or persistent CMA.

Breastfeeding duration was 15.5 months (range; 1-26 months) in patients acquired tolerance and 24 months (range; 7-25 months) in patients with persistent CMA (p<0.001). In a study by Vanto et al. (12), the authors have reported that breastfeeding duration is longer in cases with persistent CMA than patients acquired tolerance, and they have suggested that cellular cytokine and the other compounds in breast milk may be associated with persistent CMA. Suh et al. (19) have reported that breastfeeding duration has no effect on tolerance development in cases of atopic dermatitis and CMA. Although variable results have been reported in the literature, breastfeeding duration was longer in our cases with persistent CMA. We are considering that families continue to give breast milk for a long time believing that children are insufficiency nourished because of the elimination diet.

In the literature, positive family history of atopy has been reported to be a risk factor for persistent CMA (11,13,18). In contrast, Goldber et al. (20) have suggested that atopy history reported by the families may be misleading, and it may be insufficient for predicting persistent CMA in children. Positive family history of atopy was not associated with persistent CMA in our study. It has been reported that a positive family history of atopy is an independent risk factor for the other allergic disorders and inhalant allergen sensitivity (11). Although there are different results in the literature, we suggest that considering the atopy which diagnosed by a physician is more accurate approach.

Multiple food allergies were determined in 35% of cases acquired tolerance and in 15.4% of cases with persistent CMA. In a previous study (10), it was found that allergy against to other foods remained in 18% of patients when they became 4-year-old even cases had acquired tolerance to cow’s milk suggesting no effect of multiple food allergies on tolerance development. Santos et al. (11) have reported that presence of allergy against other foods is a risk factor for persistent CMA. Although there are different results in literature, we found no effect of multiple food allergies on tolerance development.

According to the literature, asthma prevalence is higher in children with persistent CMA (14-16, 21). Consistent with the literature, asthma presence was found higher in children with persistent CMA compared to children acquired tolerance in our study. Skpirak et al. (10) have suggested that the presence of asthma and rhinitis are associated with poor tolerance development. Santos et al. (11) have reported that the presence of asthma is a risk factor for persistent CMA.

In our study, angioedema was observed in 84.6%, respiratory system symptoms in 61.5% and anaphylaxis in 77% of cases with persistent CMA which all were significantly higher than those in patients acquired tolerance. Santos et al. (11) reported significantly higher rates for skin manifestations, angioedema and respiratory system symptoms in patients with persistent CMA older than 2 years old compared to patients acquired tolerance smaller than 2 years old. Early respiratory symptoms as well as skin manifestations, and more severe disease at the time of diagnosis have been reported to be risk factor for persistent CMA (22). Similarly, angioedema, respiratory system manifestations and anaphylaxis were found higher in persistent CMA patients. We concluded that persistent CMA may result from more severe clinical manifestations at the early period of disease.

It is known that extended induration diameter during the prick test negatively influences the tolerance development and it is a risk factor for persistent CMA (14,18). Santos et al. (11) found that induration diameter of >10 mm was associated with delayed tolerance. In another study, induration diameter of >5 mm was associated with persistent CMA over four-year-old (12). In our study, induration diameter of ≥8 mm for children smaller than 2 years old and ≥6 mm for children older than 2 years old correlated with persistent CMA.

Milk-specific IgE value was found to be above the predictive level in 7.7% of patients acquired tolerance and in 77% of patients with persistent CMA in our study. It is known that increased milk-specific IgE level has a negative effect on tolerance development and it is a risk factor for persistent CMA (10-12,15,23-25). Consistently, increased milk-specific IgE level was a risk factor for persistent CMA in our study. In a study by Chatchatee et al. (26), increased casein-specific IgE level was found to be associated with persistent CMA independently of patient’s age. In our study, casein-specific IgE levels were significantly higher in patients with persistent CMA.

Conclusion

In conclusion, clinical parameters and allergy test results may help to predict the prognosis of CMA. Children with CMA should be followed for the development of the other atopic disorders. Novel studies are needed to establish risk factors for tolerance development or persistence in CMA.

Ethics

Ethics Committee Approval: Ethics committee approval was obtained from Bursa Uludag University Local Ethics Committee.

Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.

Financial Disclosure: The authors declared that this study received no financial support.

References

1Fiocchi A, Brozek J, Schunemann H, Bahna SL, von Berg A, Beyer K, et al. World Allergy Organization (WAO) Diagnosis and Rationale for Action against Cow’s Milk Allergy (DRACMA) Guidelines. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2010;21:1-125.
2Sicherer CH, Sampson HA. Food allergy: Epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2014;133:291-307.
3Altıntaş D, Güneşer N, Evliyaoğlu N. A prospectivestudy of cow’s milk allergy İN Turkish infants. Acta Paediatr 1995;84:1320-1.
4NIAID-Sponsored Expert Panel, Boyce JA, Assa’ad A, Burks AW, Jones SM, Sampson HA, et al. Guidelines fort the Diagnosis and Management of Food Allergy in the United States; Report of the NIAID- Sponsored Expert Panel. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2010;126:51-8.
5Mansoor DK, Sharma HP. Clinical Presentations of Food Allergy. Pediatr Clin N Am 2011;58:315-26.
6Spergel JM, Paller AS. Atopic dermatitis and the atopic march. J Allergy Clin Immuno 2003;112:118-27.
7Fiocchi A, Terracciano L, Bouygue GR, Veglia F, Sarratud T, Martelli A, et al. Incremental prognostic factors associated with cow’s milk allergy outcomes in infant and child referrals: the Milan Cow’s Milk Allergy Cohort Study. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2008;101:166-73.
8Smith HP, Ownby RD. Clinical significance of ımmunoglobulin E. Middleton’s Allergy: Principles and Practice: 7th edition; 2009.
9Smith HP, Ownby RD. Clinical significance of ımmunoglobulin E. Middleton’s Allergy: Principles and Practice: 7th edition; 2009.
10Skripak JM, Matsui EC, Mudd K, Wood RA. The natural history of IgE-mediated cow’s milk allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2007;120:1172-7.
11Santos A, Dias A, Pinheiro JA. Predictive factors for the persistence of cow’s milk Allergy. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2010;21:1127-34.
12Vanto T, Helppila S, Juntunen-Backman K, Kalimo K, Klemola T, Korpela R, et al. Prediction of the development of tolerance to milk in children with cow’s milk hypersensitivity. J Pediatr 2004;144:218-22.
13Dias A, Santos A, Pinheiro JA. Persistence of cow’s milk allergy beyond two years of age. Allergol Immunopathol 2010;38:8-12.
14Host A, Halken S, Jacobsen HP, Christensen AE, Herskind AM, Plesner K. Clinical course of cow’s milk protein allergy/intolerance and atopic diseases in childhood. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2002;13:23-8.
15Saarinen KM, Pelkonen AS, Makela MJ, Savilahti E. Clinical course and prognosis of cow’s milk allergy are dependent on milk-specific IgE status. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2005;116:869-75.
16Host A, Halken S. A prospective study of cow milk allergy in Danish infants during the first 3 years of life. Clinical course in relation to clinical and immunological type of hypersensitivity reaction. Allergy 1990;45:587-96.
17Bishop JM, Hill DJ, Hosking CS. Natural history of cow milk allergy: clinical outcome. J Pediatr 1990;116:862-7.
18Elizur A, Rjuan N, Micheal R, Goldbeg Leshno M, Cohen A, Katz Y. Natural Course and Risk Factors for Persistence Ig E Mediated Cow’s Milk Allergy The Journal Of Pediatrics 2012;161:482-7.
19Suh J, Lee H, Lee JH, Cho J, Yu JS, Kim J, et al. Natural Course Cow’s milk Allergy in Children Atopik Dermatitis. The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences 2011;26:1152-8.
20Goldber M, Eisenberg E, Elizur A. Role of parental atopy in cow’s milk allergy: a population-based study. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2013;110:279-83.
21Sampaio G, Marinho S, Prates S, Morais-Almeida M, Rosado-Pinto J. Transient vs persistent cow’s milk allergy and development of other allergic diseases. Allergy 2005;60:411-2.
22Fiocchi A, Schünemann HJ, Brozek J, Restani P, Beyer K, Troncone R, et al. Diagnosis and Rationale for Action Against Cow’s Milk Allergy (DRACMA): a summary report 2010;126:1119-28.
23Sicherer SH, Sampson HA. Cow’s milk protein-specific IgE concentrations in two age groups of milk-allergic children and in children achieving clinical tolerance. Clin Exp Allergy 1999;29:507-12.
24Hill DJ, Firer MA, Ball G, Hosking CS. Natural history of cows’ milk allergy in children: immunological outcome over 2 years. Clin Exp Allergy 1993;23:124-31.
25Garcia-Ara MC, Boyano-Martinez MT, Diaz-Pena JM, Martin-Munoz MF, Martin-Esteban M. Cow’s milk-specific immunoglobulin E levels as predictors of clinical reactivity in the follow-up of the cow’s milk allergy infants. Clin Exp Allergy 2004;34:866-70.
26Chatchatee P, Jarvinen KM, Bardina L, Beyer K, Sampson HA. Identification of IgE-and Ig G binding epitopes on alpha (s1)-casein: differences in patients with persistent and transient cow’s milk allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2001;107:379-83.
2024 ©️ Galenos Publishing House