Introduction
Ocular traumas, especially open globe injuries, have always been one of the most frequent causes of blindness at childhood (1). Age is one of the most important risk factors for pediatric ocular traumas (2,3). Causes of open globe injuries are variable in different age groups (4). In different studies, different age groups have been defined and different results have been reported for age groups. While some studies showed younger age groups are affected most, the others showed opposite results (5-7). Twenty-one percent of hospitalizations of ophthalmology department are open globe injuries. Young adults (18-20 year-old) are the most hospitalized group for eye injury in United States (8). Injuries from desk supplies peaked in the 5-8 years age groups and toy injuries were most common in 2 to 4-year-olds (4). Though the impact of pediatric age groups on ocular trauma has been revealed, the effect of age on various parameters has not been studied in detail. In this retrospective study we investigated the pattern of open globe injury and we tried to define age, as a parameter for open globe injuries; and we defined three pediatric age groups and compared them in terms of trauma sources and its effects.
Materials and Methods
The medical records of patients under 18-year-old presenting between January 2010 and December 2013 with open-globe injury to the Uludag University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, which is the biggest tertiary centre in Northwest Turkey, were retrospectively reviewed. The study was approved by the institution and adheres to the tenets of the declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants’ parents included in the study. All patients were initially evaluated at emergency and then hospitalized for primary repair. Age, gender, the cause of the trauma, presence of intraocular foreign body and the extent of the ocular damage were recorded. The primary repair of the patients who were enrolled in the study was performed by the same surgeon. The study included 79 patients aged between 2-17 years old. These children were grouped into 3 different age groups according to the neurological and biologic development defined by Williams et al. (9). The group 1 included early childhood (age range: 2-5), group 2 middle childhood (age range: 6-11), group 3 early adolescent period (age range: 12-17) respectively. These groups were compared in terms of the defined parameters. Statistical Analysis For statistical analysis SPSS 17 program was used. Descriptive statistical methods were used to assess the study data. Oneway ANOVA test was used for comparison of quantitative data. For comparison of qualitative data Pearson chi-square and Fisher’s exact test were used. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05.
Results
The study comprised 79 patients (23 females, 56 males) with a mean age of 7.7±4.4 (range: 2-18) years. Thirty-six right, 43 left eyes were involved in the injury. The known objects causing the trauma were divided into 2 groups as blunt tip and sharp. Thirty-nine patients were injured with a blunt tip, 27 with a sharp object and one has rupture with trauma. The cause of the trauma was undefined in 12 patients. Thirty-four injuries occurred outside and 45 at home. The season in which most of the injuries took place was summer (32%), between May and September. The distribution of injuries according to months and the means of age according to months are shown in Figure 1. Forty-eight patients had corneal, nine had scleral and 22 had corneoscleral injuries, respectively. Intraocular foreign body was identified in six patients (7.6%) Sixty-seven percent of the patients had referred to our clinic in 24 hours following the injury, only 2 had referred after 48 hours. The injuries were caused by organic material in eight (10%) patients. The gender, injured eye, the relation of age with the object causing the trauma, the relation of age with the seasons and the place where the injury had occurred is given in Table 1. The age subject to blunt tip object injury was significantly higher compared to that of with sharp object, as well as the age subject to organic body injury was significantly higher than the age subject to inorganic body injury. Again, the age subject to outdoor injury was found to be significantly higher than indoor injury (p<0.05). The relation of intraocular and adnexial injury by the object causing the trauma, presence of intraocular foreign body and the need for 2 or more operations following the primary repair respectively with age is shown in Table 2. The comparison of three age groups is given in Tables 3, 4, 5. While most of the ocular injury occurred in fall in 2-5 age group, 6-11 and 12-18 groups had injury in summer at most. Most of the children with open globe injury were in group 1. Seventy-five percent of the injuries were noted in 11 years and under. Iris injury was found in 53% of 12-18 age group and was significantly higher compared to other groups (p<0.01). The outdoor injuries were also significantly higher than indoor injuries in that group (p<0.05). The adnexial injuries were encountered only in five patients but it is remarkable that all the patients were in group 1 (p=0.024).
Discussion
The second most common cause of childhood monocular blindness is trauma. The open globe injuries have been the third cause of hospitalization for the pediatric ocular trauma in USA following the open wound injuries of ocular adnexa and orbital floor fractures (8). In one study conducted in Turkey, 43% of all ocular trauma occurred in age group younger than 18 years old (10). In this retrospective study we defined 3 different age groups as 2-5, 6-11 and 12-17 years according to pediatric neurological and physical development. We could not find any significant statistical difference in terms of different parameters between groups except iris trauma and the place of the trauma. However when we assessed parameters regarding age, we found significant difference with iris trauma, place of the trauma, properties of the object which caused the trauma, additional adnexial damage, need for a secondary operation. There are studies concerning childhood ocular trauma in which mean ages or age groups have been given, however in these studies age groups have not been compared to each other. Also the peak age groups are variable. While the open globe injury constituted 30% of total hospitalizations for ocular trauma in ages 9-11, it was 15% at ages between 15 and 17 in USA (8). Bunting et al. (5) noted that 45% of all injuries have occurred under 5 year-old and this age group is a risk factor for final vision. The rates of ocular trauma change between 38% and 54% in 4-10 age group, as given in studies from Asia (7,8,9,10,11,8,9,10,11,12). A study from Europe reported that 54% of the total traumas were at ages between 8 and 12 (6). Armstrong et al. (2) reported that rates of eye injuries were highest in children at 15-17 years of age. In our study 42% of ocular injuries took place in group 1, 38% in group 2 and 20% in group 3. Seventy-five percent of the injuries occurred under 11 years, in accord with the studies from Asia. The recent studies from different regions all around the world revealed the mean age for ocular injury is between 7-11 years (6,7). The mean age of open-globe injuries in pediatric group was found to be 8 (12,13). The mean age is also 8 in our study, in accord with the results of other studies. Male/female ratio has been found higher in almost all studies (2). Male/female ratio is just about 2.5 fold in our study. Alpay et al. (14) reported that males had significantly higher ocular trauma rate at ages between 10 and 19. According to some publications, the rate of pediatric ocular trauma increase by age and male/female ratio increase in ocular trauma related hospitalizations (8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15). We found no significant difference regarding male/female ratio between 3 age groups. In our study concerning only open-globe injuries 57% of the traumas occurred indoor, in accord with the others (2,3,4,5,6,7,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16). Armstrong et al. (2) reported that 0-4 age group has the highest risk of indoor injuries. In older age groups, the rates of outdoor trauma increase, similar to our results. In our study, 64% of open globe injuries in group 1 occurred at home. The ocular traumas most frequently occurred in spring and summer. However, the effect of age on seasonal variation has not been assessed (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18). Also in our study, most of the injuries took place in summer, though the majority of injuries were at autumn and winter in smaller age groups spending more time at home. The higher frequency of trauma in summer is attributed to the time spent outside away from parental supervision (2). The organic objects have been reported to be responsible for 8-22% of open-globe injuries, whereas sharp metals, scissors, knives and glass cause 45-55% of the open globe injuries (11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19). In our study, 41% of the injuries were due to sharp objects and 10% due to organic materials. In 1% to 5% of pediatric age group, the causative agent could not be identified (11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19). We could not identify the causative agent in 15% of the cases. We think that these children with a history of fall do not tell exactly what happened outdoor away from family supervision since they got panicked and scared. In our study, the children in adolescent group were exposed to inorganic and blunt tip objects more. This may be due to the fact that the injuries took place outdoor. The occurrence of the injuries mostly in summer and outdoor in this age group supports our idea. The smaller age groups were exposed to indoor injuries in fall and winter. The sharp objects caused injury more in smaller age groups since they are easily accessible at home. The additional adnexial injuries were noted in first group, most likely due to the relatively small area in the entire face covered by the eye, thus facilitating the injury around the eyes. By advancing age, we think that the eyes become more prone to trauma as the eyes cover a larger area in the face and with the direct impact of more severe trauma, more iris injury occurs and the need for a secondary operation increases.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the most significant difference amongst the age groups in Northwest Turkey was the place of the trauma and the properties of the objects causing the trauma. The way the trauma occurs and the severity of the trauma may affect the visual prognosis. The open globe-injury rate in Northwest Turkey is found to be higher in small age groups. The awareness of the parents and avoidance of easily accessible sharp objects may decrease the trauma rates. Both in pediatric outpatient and ophthalmology outpatient clinics the children and the families should be informed and warned. Hereby, the psychological and financial burden on the society and the family may be prevented. Ethics Ethics Committee Approval: This study retrospective, Informed Consent: It was taken. Peer-review: Externally peer-reviewed. Authorship Contributions Surgical and Medical Practices: Berna Akova Budak, Sertaç Argun Kivanç, Concept: Berna Akova Budak, Sertaç Argun Kivanç, Ahmet Tuncer Özmen, Design: Berna Akova Budak, Sertaç Argun Kivanç, Ahmet Tuncer Özmen, Meral Yildiz, Data Collection or Processing: Mediha Tok Çevik, Nagihan Amuk Hamidi, Analysis or Interpretation: Berna Akova Budak, Sertaç Argun Kivanç, Ahmet Tuncer Özmen, Literature Search: Mediha Tok Çevik, Nagihan Amuk Hamidi, Ahmet Tuncer Özmen, Meral Yildiz, Writing: Berna Akova Budak, Sertaç Argun Kivanç. Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors. Financial Disclosure: The authors declared that this study received no financial support.
